Top issues
25 known problems · 1 highAt this odometer
See which of this car's known problems are due at that mileage, which should already have been dealt with, and what's coming up.
Generations
Best and worst years for the Ford Falcon Ute →
Overview
A 23-year run of rear-drive Aussie workhorse utes built on the long-wheelbase Falcon commercial platform: leaf-sprung live rear axle, separate-ish body, and an engine bay that has held everything from a carby crossflow six to a Cleveland and Windsor V8. There were three broad eras. The XD-XE-XF (1979-1993) used carburetted 3.3 and 4.1 'crossflow' sixes (the 4.1 got Bosch then EEC-IV EFI options late in the XE/XF) plus optional 4.9/5.8 Cleveland V8s early on; these are now genuine classics and rust and tired mechanicals matter more than spec. The XG-XH (1993-1999) brought the modern 4.0 SOHC EFI six (the 'Intech' precursor) and a hotter XR6. The AU (1999-2002) modernised the cab, ran the 4.0 Intech SOHC six, an Intech VCT XR6, a dedicated E-Gas LPG six, and the 5.0 Windsor V8 in XR8. These are cheap, simple, parts-everywhere utes; pick a rust-free body and a sound driveline and they tow and work hard for little money. The crossflow six is bulletproof but slow and thirsty; the 4.0 SOHC has well-known coil-pack, gasket and cooling o-ring niggles; the AU's biggest enemy is body/chassis rust. Always inspect the chassis rails, cab corners and tray mounts before anything else.
Engines & variants
3.3L 200 crossflow six (carb)
Pros
- Dead-simple OHV six - anyone can work on it
- Cheapest XD-XF commercial to buy and run
- Parts everywhere and very cheap
- Tough bottom end if oil changes were kept up
Cons
- Genuinely gutless - the 4.1 is the one to have
- Carby tuning and choke gremlins on tired examples
- Pre-1986 engines have softer valve seats (leaded-fuel era)
- Thirsty for the performance offered
Known problems
4.1L 250 crossflow six (carb / EFI)
Pros
- The classic Aussie work six - torquey and unburstable
- Tows well for its age; loved by old-school towers
- Late XF EFI (EEC-IV) versions run far cleaner and start easier
- Cheap, simple, parts everywhere
- Easy to mod (extractors, carb, head work)
Cons
- Thirsty, especially the carby versions
- Carby tune drift on tired examples
- Pre-1986 valve seat softness on leaded-era heads
- Performance is modest by modern standards
Known problems
4.9L / 5.8L Cleveland V8 (XD-XE)
Pros
- Genuine Aussie Cleveland V8 grunt and character
- Strong torque for towing and load
- Collectible now - desirable in a ute
- Simple pushrod design, well supported by the aftermarket
Cons
- Very thirsty
- Only offered early (V8 dropped during the XE run, mid-1982)
- Genuine V8 utes are rare and command big premiums
- Leaded-fuel-era, runs hot if cooling is tired
Known problems
4.0L SOHC EFI six (XG-XH)
Pros
- Big jump in refinement and power over the crossflow
- Strong low-down torque, tows well
- EFI - reliable starting and driveability
- Cheap to buy and run, parts plentiful
- XR6 (161kW) adds a sportier edge
Cons
- Cooling system o-rings and gaskets age out
- Coil/ignition niggles as they get older
- Still a fairly thirsty 4.0 six
- XG-XH cabs more dated than the AU
Known problems
4.0L Intech SOHC six (AU, petrol)
Pros
- Strong, torquey six with good driveability
- Modernised AU cab and ergonomics
- Very cheap to buy now with parts everywhere
- Tows and works hard for little money
- BTR 4-speed auto or T5 manual both well supported
Cons
- Head gasket and cooling o-ring issues if neglected
- Coil pack / ignition lead misfires with age
- AU bodies/chassis rust is the real concern
- Series 1 styling and brake-disc warping criticised
Known problems
4.0L Intech VCT six (AU XR6)
Pros
- Tickford-developed VCT adds noticeably more punch
- Sportier XR6 spec - better brakes, seats, suspension
- Same robust 4.0 architecture, parts everywhere
- Most desirable AU ute six - holds value better
Cons
- Shares the AU head gasket / cooling o-ring weaknesses
- Coil pack / lead misfires with age
- VCT phaser can rattle on cold start if oil/maintenance neglected
- AU rust applies the same as any other
Known problems
4.0L Intech E-Gas dedicated LPG (AU)
Pros
- Factory-engineered dedicated LPG - cheap to run on gas
- Hardened valve seats from factory for LPG (unlike DIY conversions)
- Popular ex-fleet/tradie ute - very cheap to buy
- Same tough 4.0 bottom end
Cons
- Less power and slightly thirstier than petrol on energy basis
- Tank robs some tray/under-body space and adds weight
- Gas-system components (converter, mixer, locks) age and need servicing
- Diminishing LPG availability in some areas now
Known problems
5.0L Windsor V8 (AU XR8)
Pros
- Effortless Windsor V8 torque and sound
- XR8 ute is desirable and holds value
- Robust pushrod V8, huge aftermarket support
- Better brakes/suspension in XR spec
Cons
- Thirsty compared to the six
- Higher purchase and running cost than six-cylinder utes
- Shares AU body/chassis rust risk
- Earlier Windsor is less powerful than later BA Boss V8s
Known problems