Top issues
17 known problems · 3 highRecalls
2 on recordCheck a specific car by VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
At this odometer
See which of this car's known problems are due at that mileage, which should already have been dealt with, and what's coming up.
Generations
Best and worst years for the Holden Ute →
Overview
The VE (2007-2013) and facelifted VF (2013-2017) Ute was the last of the locally-built Holden 'one-tonner-style' coupe-utilities, built on the Australian-designed Zeta rear-drive platform and sold as Omega/Ute, SV6, SS and SS-V (plus Storm/Thunder/Magnum/Redline specials). It is a car-based ute - independent rear suspension, sedan refinement, a modest 1600kg braked tow rating - bought as much for fun and as a V8 cult car as for work. Engine choice defines the buy: the early Alloytec 3.6 V6 (and to a lesser extent the later SIDI V6) is notorious for timing-chain stretch, while the Gen IV/LS V8s (6.0 L98/L76/L77 and the VF II 6.2 LS3) are strong but share the family LS hydraulic-lifter/AFM lifter-collapse risk and cold piston slap. A dedicated-LPG 3.6 V6 was also offered. Huge parts and aftermarket support, cheap to run for a V6, but the V8s are thirsty and timing-chain V6s need their service history scrutinised. The final VF II V8s (2016) were also caught by a faulty inlet rocker-arm batch recall.
Engines & variants
3.6L Alloytec V6 (LE0 / LY7)
Pros
- Cheapest VE Ute to buy and run
- Australian-built engine with enormous parts support
- High Output (SV6) version is genuinely brisk
- RWD chassis is fun and refined for a ute
Cons
- Timing-chain stretch is the defining Alloytec fault
- Heavier on fuel than rivals' four-cylinders
- Modest 1600kg tow rating limits work/touring use
- Service history is critical - poorly-serviced engines fail chains early
Known problems
3.6L SIDI V6 (LFX)
Pros
- Direct injection lifts power to 210kW and improves economy over the Alloytec
- Six-speed auto/manual is a big step up from the early 4AT
- Strong, smooth and cheap to maintain
- Best all-round value VE/VF Ute engine
Cons
- Still a chain-driven HFV6 - timing-chain stretch is reduced but not eliminated
- Direct injection can cause intake-valve carbon build-up over time
- Thirstier than a modern turbo-four
- 1600kg tow rating unchanged
Known problems
3.6L LPG V6 (LWR, dedicated gas)
Pros
- Factory-engineered liquid-injection LPG - far better than aftermarket conversions
- Cheap per-km running cost on LPG
- Purpose-built high-compression engine, not a retrofit
- Popular with fleets and tradies for fuel savings
Cons
- Shrinking LPG refuelling network in Australia
- Reduced boot/tray packaging and range considerations
- Discontinued with VF II (2015) - support narrows over time
- Same chain-driven HFV6 architecture
Known problems
6.0L V8 (L98 / L76 / L77)
Pros
- Big, torquey, characterful Aussie V8 - the heart of the SS/SS-V cult following
- Robust LS pushrod architecture with a single, durable timing chain
- Massive aftermarket and tuning support, easy big-power gains
- Strong resale and enthusiast demand
Cons
- Thirsty, especially the manual (no AFM) and when driven hard
- AFM (L76/L77 auto) models risk a collapsed lifter wiping the cam
- Cold-start piston slap is common (usually cosmetic, but check it warms out)
- 1600kg tow rating despite the grunt
Known problems
6.2L LS3 V8
Pros
- Corvette-sourced 304kW/570Nm LS3 - the most powerful and most desirable VF II ute engine
- No AFM/cylinder deactivation, so avoids the AFM lifter-collapse trap
- Strong, simple LS architecture with huge tuning headroom
- Last-of-line VF II collectability and strong resale
Cons
- Very thirsty, especially driven hard
- Final 2016 build caught by a faulty inlet rocker-arm batch recall
- Still shares LS hydraulic-lifter wear risk at high km
- Premium pricing for clean low-km examples
Known problems