Top issues
17 known problems · 5 highRecalls
2 on recordCheck a specific car by VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
At this odometer
See which of this car's known problems are due at that mileage, which should already have been dealt with, and what's coming up.
Before and after
Overview
The Mazda Bravo is the Australian name for Mazda's B-Series ute, and across this long run it was effectively the same vehicle as the Ford Courier — Mazda and Ford co-developed and shared the platform, with the Bravo being the Mazda-badged version built in Japan. It spans two clearly different shapes: the older UF series (1985-1998, square-edged) and the more modern UN series (1998-2006, rounder, with the suicide-door 'Freestyle Cab' added). Engine choice drives the buying decision: the petrol 2.6L (G6/G6E) is the simple, durable workhorse motor most UF and UN Bravos carry; the UN B2500 diesel came as a gutless naturally aspirated WL and a much more useful turbo WL-T; and right at the end (2005-2006) a 4.0L Cologne V6 'B4000' arrived. The big caveats are well known in Australia: the WL/WL-T diesel head is prone to cracking at high km, all of these engines are timing-BELT driven (a snapped belt on these interference-risk motors is costly), and as old, hard-worked trade utes most have rust and tired leaf-sprung rear ends. A solid, honest budget 4x4 — not a Hilux for resale, but cheap to buy and simple to fix. Replaced by the BT-50 in late 2006.
Engines & variants
2.2L F2 petrol (B2200)
Pros
- Dead-simple, cheap to run and fix
- Tough little workhorse four, plenty in wreckers
- Lightest and cheapest UF Bravo to buy
- No diesel complexity or turbo to worry about
Cons
- Underpowered, slow when loaded
- Carburettor examples need a tuner who knows them
- Only 2WD in most B2200 trims
- All examples are now very old and high-km
Known problems
2.6L G6/G6E petrol (B2600)
Pros
- The proven, simple Bravo workhorse engine
- More usable torque than the 2.2 and quieter than the diesel
- Available in 4x4 - a genuinely cheap budget tourer
- Cheap to buy and dirt-cheap parts
- No turbo, DPF or common-rail injectors to fail
Cons
- Thirsty for its size and modest power
- 12-valve head can warp/crack if overheated
- Lower resale than equivalent Hilux/Navara
- Most are tired ex-trade utes
Known problems
2.5L WL naturally aspirated diesel (B2500)
Pros
- Frugal and very simple mechanical diesel
- No turbo to fail, cheap and easy to service
- Same tough bottom end as the WL-T
- Long-legged and economical for light duties
Cons
- Genuinely slow and gutless, especially loaded or in 4x4
- Struggles to tow or climb at highway pace
- Same head-crack tendency as the WL-T
- Less desirable than the turbo - but cheaper
Known problems
2.5L WL-T turbo diesel (B2500)
Pros
- Far more usable than the NA diesel - good low-down torque
- Frugal for a 4x4 ute of the era
- Simple pre-common-rail diesel, no DPF or fragile high-pressure injectors
- The Bravo diesel most people actually want
- Cheap to buy as a budget tourer/work ute
Cons
- Head cracking is the well-known Achilles heel
- Only ever offered with a 5-speed manual
- Indirect-injection is noisier and less refined than rivals
- Hard-worked/towing examples cook the head sooner
Known problems
4.0L Cologne V6 petrol (B4000)
Pros
- Strong, smooth V6 - by far the most powerful Bravo
- Chain-driven timing (no belt to replace)
- Rare and the last/flagship Bravo before the BT-50
- Easy effortless towing and highway pace
- Shares the proven Ford Courier/Ranger V6 driveline
Cons
- Very thirsty - a petrol V6 in a heavy 4x4 ute
- Only sold for two years, so examples are scarce
- Auto can be sluggish and uses more fuel again
- Few buyers want petrol, so it sells cheap (good for buyers)
Known problems